USGS Fact Sheet on the Middle Verde Watershed

Assessment of Environmental Flows in the Middle Verde River Watershed, Arizona

From a fact sheet summarizing analyses of middle Verde River watershed environmental flows detailed in USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2017-5100, Preliminary Synthesis and Assessment of Environmental Flows in the Middle Verde River Watershed, Arizona, by N.V. Paretti, A.M.D. Brasher, S.L. Pearlstein, D.M. Skow, B. Gungle, and B.D. Garner. Click here to download the fact sheet.

Introduction

The Verde River is among the largest streams in Arizona. Its watershed covers 4.2 million acres in central Arizona, includes about 500 miles of perennial streams, and provides 40 percent of the surface water delivered to the Phoenix metropolitan area by the Salt River Project (The Nature Conservancy, 2009). The Verde River watershed is home to a number of native fish and special status species. The flows that occur in the middle Verde River watershed are largely unregulated and are less affected by urban use, urban and agricultural runoff, and channelization than in the lower Verde River watershed.

The magnitude, frequency, duration, timing, and rate of change of hydrologic conditions can be used to characterize the entire range of stream flows, from low flows to floods, that are critical to the integrity of river ecosystems (Poff and others, 1997). Environmental flows describe the hydrologic conditions necessary to sustain properly functioning aquatic ecosystems which in turn support human livelihoods and well-being (Arthington and others, 2018). Streams altered by human modifications, such as dams, diversions, or channel engineering, can still be managed to mimic an environmental flow regime that meets ecological and social objectives (Acreman and others, 2014). To understand the consequences of various water-use scenarios to Arizona’s middle Verde River watershed ecosystem, the USGS set out to first understand the system’s environmental flows. The purpose of Paretti and others (2018) was to compile existing hydrological and ecological data to better understand environmental flows in the setting of the middle Verde River watershed.

Ecosystem water needs include use by riparian vegetation and the habitat requirements of fish and macroinvertebrates (aquatic insects). The hydrologic characteristics that affect ecosystem water needs include both streamflow (that is, the magnitude, frequency, timing, and variabil­ity of flow) and groundwater conditions such as depth to groundwater and annual fluctuations of groundwater levels (Poff and others, 2010; Konrad and others, 2008).

Surface Water and Groundwater

The first step in determining Verde River environmental flows was to develop estimates of flow regimes that sustain properly functioning ecosystems. The natural hydrologic regime of a river or stream can be divided into four components — floods, high-flow pulses, base flows, and extreme low flows. To represent these components of the natural flow regime, measures of magnitude, timing, duration, frequency, and rate of change of streamflow must be developed (Poff and others, 1997).

Southwestern desert streams, including the Verde River, are characterized by large variations in flow magnitude. However, flow in the Verde River and its tributaries is frequently composed entirely of groundwater discharging to the stream channel. Such base-flow regimes are highly dependent on groundwater/ surface-water interactions

Geomorphology

Water depth and velocity, which are controlled by channel geomorphology (the shape and material of the riverbed), result in stream habitat features such as pools, riffles, and runs. The most diverse fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages are found in streams that have more complex riffle, run, and pool habitat, with large wood, boulders, undercut banks, and tree roots. Human use of stream areas often results in the destruction of this habitat caused by increased sedimentation and (or) reduction in flow. This leads to negative impacts on biological health through a reduction in species diver­sity and abundance. Pool, riffle, and run features were quantified for separate reaches of the Verde River from aerial imagery. The upper-middle and lower-middle reaches of the Verde River in the middle Verde River watershed are similarly complex geomorphologically, although the upper-middle reach had more riffle habitat and less pool habitat than the lower-middle reach.

Riparian Vegetation

The Verde River watershed contains some of the most extensive acreage of Fremont cottonwood-Goodding willow forest and mixed broadleaf riparian forest in Arizona and is home to the threatened yellow-billed cuckoo and the endangered southwestern willow flycatcher (Stevens and others, 2008). Because of the relatively unregulated flow of the Verde River, ripar­ian vegetation along the banks varies in age, which is instrumental in maintaining forest resiliency.

An analysis of aerial imagery showed that the upper-middle Verde River water­shed has more upland plant species, such as junipers, and fewer lowland species, such as cottonwoods and mesquites, compared to their abundance in the lower-middle sections. Differences in vegetation within the upper-middle and lower-middle reaches appear to be related more to differences in climate and hydrology than to human alterations.

Aquatic Insects

Aquatic insects such as mayflies and caddisflies play a crucial role in the food web of a stream ecosystem, and their abun­dance and diversity is an indicator of stream health. Because these insects live for a year or more and rarely move beyond a given river reach, their response to local water-quality conditions is useful in assessing the ecological condition of a stream. Several aquatic insect community metrics signifi­cantly increased or decreased based on flow conditions defined by season, magnitude of flow, presence of river diversions, and stream size (Verde River or tributary).

Aquatic insect samples and habitat measurements were collected from six sites in the upper-middle Verde River to bet­ter understand flow-habitat relations. The largest insect diversity was at the Clarkdale stream-gage site. The Verde River below Granite Creek site had slower stream veloc­ity, smaller substrate, and greater riparian cover than the other five sites. It also had a different insect community than the other sites, including the greatest variety of cad­disfly types, lowest variety of mayfly types, and lowest overall diversity of all loca­tions. Several insect types were observed at the Verde River Below Granite Creek site that were not found at any of the other five locations, likely because of the differ­ences in flow and habitat type. The Paulden stream-gage site had the greatest range of stream velocities of all the sites and a large variety of mayfly types, but very low midge diversity. The other four stations were simi­lar in overall diversity and caddisfly types, and in particular, the Perkinsville Bridge and Reitz Ranch samples had similar insect community structures.

Fish

The native fish of the Southwest are highly adapted to a range of condi­tions that include extreme temperatures, unpredictable flood flows, and sediment-laden waters (Rinne, 1992; Lytle and Poff, 2004); they are also under stress from changes in river ecosystems and flows. During high flow years, native fish species typically increase in num­bers and nonnative species decrease in numbers (Rinne, 2005; Gido and Propst, 2012). In the middle Verde River water­shed, native fish have been declining since the introduction of nonnative fish species nearly a century ago; high flows are one of the last remaining natural defenses native fish have against nonna­tive fish pressures.

The abundance and distribution of native and nonnative fish were deter­mined at five sites in the middle Verde River watershed. Five species were iden­tified as native and 10 were nonnative. Longfin and speckled dace were only collected at the Perkinsville site, and rock bass, black bullhead, and common carp were only collected at Oak Creek. The percentage of non-native species was greater at the Paulden location and at the Oak Creek and West Clear Creek tributaries. The Verde River Below Granite Creek and the Perkinsville sites had similar percentages of individual native fish, but the Verde River Below Granite Creek and the Paulden sites had the most similar fish assemblages.

The median stream velocity associ­ated with the native fish species was sig­nificantly faster than that associated with nonnative fish species and native fish used a wider range of velocities than did nonnative species. The median stream velocity associated with the nonnative fish was significantly slower than that of the available microhabitat, and velocities associated with native fish were faster than the median velocity of the available microhabitat. Although both native and nonnative fish used most water depths, nonnative species preferred the shallow­est depths whereas native species more commonly used depths greater than 2.3 feet. Both native and nonnative species used all sizes of substrate, but in general, native fish were significantly more likely to use coarser substrates (in particular, gravels and cobbles) than nonnative fish, and nonnative fish preferred smaller diameter substrate than native fish.

Future Directions

The empirical relations deter­mined in this study can be used to develop the basis for a conceptual model of environmental flows in the middle Verde River watershed. A robust conceptual model can provide the foundation for developing physi­cally based, quantitative and predic­tive models of environmental flows for the middle Verde River. Such models can improve the understanding of the effects of increased stresses from climate vari­ability and the demands on the water supply of the Verde River.